A final note about the Chinese study in the previous post: the overweight vegetable-eaters (read: wheat eaters) exercised more than their non-vegetable-eating, thin neighbors. So although their average calorie intake was a bit higher, their expenditure was as well.
Although I speculated in the last post that affluent people might be eating more wheat and fresh vegetables, the data don't support that. Participants with the highest income level actually adhered to the wheat and vegetable-rich pattern the least, while low-income participants were most likely to eat this way.
Interestingly, education showed a (weaker) trend in the opposite direction. More educated participants were more likely to eat the wheat-vegetable pattern, while the opposite was true of less educated participants. Thus, it looks like wheat makes people more educated. Just kidding, that's exactly the logic we have to avoid when interpreting this type of study!
Labels
April fool's
archaeology
book review
cancer
Cardiovascular disease
celiac
cholesterol
cob
dementia
dental health
diabetes
diet
disease
diseases of civilization
environment
evolution
exercise
fat-soluble vitamins
fats
Food reward
French paradox
genetics
gluten
gout
hormesis
hyperphagia
hypertension
infection
Inuit
Kitava
Kuna
lard
lectins
leptin
liver
low-carb
Masai
meditation
metabolic syndrome
minerals
native diet
natural building
nutritionism
overweight
paleolithic diet
phytic acid
Pima
presentations
real food
research bloopers
salad
San
sleep
smoking
soup stock
success stories
superstimuli
thrift
thyroid
Tokelau
yogurt
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(123)
-
▼
July
(11)
- The Inuit: Lessons from the Arctic
- Book Review: "The Human Diet: Its Origins and Evol...
- Sunscreen and Melanoma
- Melanoma and Sunblock
- Grains and Human Evolution
- Another China Tidbit
- Wheat in China
- Cancer in Other Non-Industrialized Cultures
- Mortality and Lifespan of the Inuit
- Cancer Among the Inuit
- Cancer and the Immune System
-
▼
July
(11)
0 comments:
Post a Comment